<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BaselineStats.com: College Basketball Stats and Analysis &#187; UAB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baselinestats.com/tag/uab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baselinestats.com</link>
	<description>College hoops stats and analysis for the die-hard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:40:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bracket Junkie: Will any teams play their way in?</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100312/bracket-junkie-will-any-teams-play-their-way-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100312/bracket-junkie-will-any-teams-play-their-way-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bracket Junkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seton Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William & Mary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=1924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





Printable Version of Bracket &#187;
&#160;
Note: Teams deemed at least 98-percent likely to make the NCAA Tournament are in bold below. Three new teams earned their bold tags this week &#8212; Notre Dame and perhaps a couple of controversial teams, UTEP and Utah State. Even though Florida, Virginia Tech and California are ahead of locks like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table align="center">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100311.gif"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
<a href="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100311.gif">Printable Version of Bracket &raquo;</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Teams deemed at least 98-percent likely to make the NCAA Tournament are in <b>bold</b> below. Three new teams earned their bold tags this week &#8212; Notre Dame and perhaps a couple of controversial teams, UTEP and Utah State. Even though Florida, Virginia Tech and California are ahead of locks like Wake Forest and Missouri in my S-curve, they could all still lose. I don&#8217;t yet trust the committee to definitely put all three in if any were to lose today, though I&#8217;d bet they will all make it regardless. That leaves eight bids up for grabs, a number that could still shrink with conference-tournament upsets.<span id="more-1924"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as At-large:</strong> Georgia Tech, Seton Hall</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as At-large:</strong> Memphis, Arizona State</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as Automatic:</strong> Robert Morris (America East), Montana (Big Sky), Akron (Mid-American)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as Automatic:</strong> Quinnipiac (America East), Weber State (Big Sky), Kent State (Mid-American)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>On the Bubble:</strong> I don&#8217;t believe that Seton Hall will ultimately make the field, but I am guessing that the Pirates would get the nod right now. With four top-50 wins and no bad losses, Bobby Gonzalez&#8217;s team has a 2009 Providence look about it. Those Friars were left out and these Pirates probably will be, too, but a weaker bubble has them in for now.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There are just so few teams that have anything approaching legitimate cases, and most of them ruined themselves with bad losses yesterday. Arizona State, Memphis and UAB all had crippling losses in its conference quarterfinals, which would make their inclusion on Sunday very surprising. Illinois, Mississippi State and Rhode Island are the only teams on the outside that still have a chance to play their way in. Washington, Mississippi and San Diego State could all play their ways out today.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It appears that <a href="http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix_2010.htm" target="_blank">most projectors</a> have decided to go with Illinois in that last spot for now. I don&#8217;t like the chances of a team with a 77 RPI and five losses in their last six making the field. If the Illini lose to Wisconsin this afternoon, they&#8217;re probably out, but there may also be some Arizona-ness about them. At least Arizona&#8217;s RPI was at 61, and the Wildcats had six top-50 wins; Illinois has just four. Despite the erratic play of the bubble teams, there seems to be a widespread consensus on the other 33 teams in the field. I do wonder if, in a year where the bubble is so weak, a team like Wichita State or even William &#038; Mary could sneak in. I doubt that will happen, but it wouldn&#8217;t be a complete shocker for the committee to reward a mid-major over a team like Mississippi State, Illinois or Seton Hall.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have an update with locks, last 10 in and last 10 out on Saturday, a final projection on Sunday morning with a possible update in the afternoon if need be.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Atlantic 10 Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Temple (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Xavier (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Richmond (No. 7)</strong><br />
Rhode Island (seventh-to-last out)<br />
Dayton (12th-to-last out)<br />
Saint Louis (15th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Duke (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Maryland (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Florida State (No. 8, moved to No. 7 for conference balancing)</strong><br />
<strong>Clemson (No. 9)</strong><br />
Virginia Tech (No. 11, ninth-to-last in)<br />
<strong>Wake Forest (No. 11, seventh-to-last in)</strong><br />
Georgia Tech (No. 11, sixth-to-last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Kansas (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Kansas State (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Baylor (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Texas A&#038;M (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Texas (No. 8)</strong><br />
<strong>Oklahoma State (No. 8)</strong><br />
<strong>Missouri (No. 10, 10th-to-last in)</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Syracuse (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>West Virginia (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Villanova (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Georgetown (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Pittsburgh (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Marquette (No. 7)</strong><br />
<strong>Notre Dame (No. 7, moved to No. 8 for conference balancing)</strong><br />
<strong>Louisville (No. 10)</strong><br />
Seton Hall (No. 12, second-to-last in)<br />
Cincinnati (eighth-to-last out)<br />
South Florida (ninth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Ohio State (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Purdue (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Wisconsin (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Michigan State (No. 5)</strong><br />
Illinois (third-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mountain West Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>New Mexico (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Brigham Young (No. 6)</strong><br />
UNLV (No. 11, fifth-to-last in)<br />
San Diego State (No. 13, last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>California (No. 9)<br />
Washington (No. 12, fourth-to-last in)<br />
Arizona State (10th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Kentucky (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Tennessee (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Vanderbilt (No. 4)</strong><br />
Florida (No. 11, eighth-to-last in)<br />
Mississippi (No. 12, third-to-last in)<br />
Mississippi State (fourth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Butler (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Northern Iowa (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Gonzaga (No. 7)</strong><br />
<strong>UTEP (No. 8)</strong><br />
<strong>Utah State (No. 9)</strong><br />
<strong>Old Dominion (No. 9)</strong><br />
<strong>Siena (No. 11)</strong><br />
<strong>Saint Mary&#8217;s (No. 12)</strong><br />
Wichita State (last out)<br />
Memphis (second-to-last out)<br />
UAB (sixth-to-last out)<br />
William &#038; Mary (seventh-to-last out)<br />
Kent State (11th-to-last out)<br />
Tulsa (13th-to-last out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100312/bracket-junkie-will-any-teams-play-their-way-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bracket Junkie: Welcoming four new teams to the field</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100308/bracket-junkie-welcoming-four-new-teams-to-the-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100308/bracket-junkie-welcoming-four-new-teams-to-the-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bracket Junkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brigham Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clemson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gonzaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Dominion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purdue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Mary's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seton Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syracuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas A&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNLV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Villanova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wake Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William & Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xavier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





Printable Version of Bracket &#187;
&#160;
Note: Teams deemed at least 98-percent likely to make the NCAA Tournament are in bold. Three new at-large teams earned their bold tags over the weekend &#8212; Louisville, Oklahoma State and Wake Forest. Notre Dame and Virginia Tech just missed.
&#160;
Moving In as At-large: Arizona State, Mississippi, San Diego State, Washington
&#160;
Moving Out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table align="center">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100307.gif"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
<a href="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100307.gif">Printable Version of Bracket &raquo;</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Teams deemed at least 98-percent likely to make the NCAA Tournament are in <b>bold</b>. Three new at-large teams earned their bold tags over the weekend &#8212; Louisville, Oklahoma State and Wake Forest. Notre Dame and Virginia Tech just missed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as At-large:</strong> Arizona State, Mississippi, San Diego State, Washington</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as At-large:</strong> Georgia Tech, Illinois, Rhode Island, UAB</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as Automatic:</strong> Vermont (America East), East Tennessee State (Atlantic Sun), Winthrop (Big South)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as Automatic:</strong> Stony Brook (America East), Jacksonville (Atlantic Sun), Coastal Carolina (Big South)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>On the Bubble:</strong> There was a lot of shuffling around the bubble this weekend with several teams suffering near-devastating losses. Georgia Tech and Illinois both had blowout losses at home. The loss for the Yellow Jackets is their third in five and fifth in seven, and more importantly, it puts them at 7-9 in conference. To me, Illinois only looked like an NCAA Tournament team for about a week all season &#8212; when it beat Wisconsin and Michigan State. We&#8217;ll see if that 10-8 conference record is enough to override losing five of six and dropping games to Georgia, Bradley and Utah out of conference. Rhode Island lost its fifth of seven against 18-loss UMass in Amherst on Saturday. That will be hard to overcome. Finally, UAB needed to win one of its two tough games this week, but the Blazers lost both by a total of seven points, including a 52-50 win at C-USA champ UTEP on Saturday.<span id="more-1872"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There is a distinctly western flavor to the teams moving into the field. The Pac-10 may turn out to be the greatest beneficiary of the inability of most bubble teams to win down the stretch. Arizona State finished 12-6 in conference after a win over UCLA, and Washington had a strong second half to put Oregon State away in Corvallis. SDSU finished 11-5 in the Mountain West after having no trouble at all with lowly Air Force in Colorado Springs. Mississippi stormed back in the second half to knock off Arkansas in Fayetteville. It&#8217;s a 20 minutes that may prove decisive to the Rebels&#8217; season.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Atlantic 10:</strong> The closing weeks of the season couldn&#8217;t have been any worse for the Atlantic 10, which once appeared likely to get five bids. In their last seven games of the season, Charlotte, Dayton and Rhode Island combined to win just five times &#8212; that&#8217;s 5-16. One of those wins was in a game between Charlotte and Rhode Island, and another was a home win over winless Fordham for Rhody. None of the five wins was against any of the league&#8217;s top three. Saint Louis has passed Charlotte and Dayton on my at-large model, but URI may be the only salvageable team. With a run to the finals of the A-10 Tournament, the Rams could dance.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Temple, Xavier and Richmond continue to play for seeding, all winning over the weekend. The A-10 Tournament champ, assuming it&#8217;s one of those three and that justice is served, should be rewarded with a No. 4 seed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Atlantic 10 Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Temple (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Xavier (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Richmond (No. 7)</strong><br />
Rhode Island (seventh-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC:</strong> Wake Forest and Virginia Tech got the wins they needed this weekend. The Demon Deacons were victorious at home against Clemson, and the Hokies went to Atlanta and stunned Georgia Tech. The Yellow Jackets are now in serious trouble with that ugly 7-9 conference record. In Georgia Tech&#8217;s defense, it did play the second-toughest conference schedule, getting Duke twice and Maryland on the road. The Jackets have four top-50 wins to their credit but none since January. GaTech plays North Carolina in a 7-10 game on Thursday, which is a must-win. The question is whether Paul Hewitt&#8217;s team will need a victory over Maryland in the quarterfinals. I suspect a respectable showing should be enough.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Duke and Maryland closed out their seasons with victories over lesser opposition to tie for the ACC regular-season title. The Blue Devils remain a No. 1 seed, West Virginia being the No. 2 with the only legitimate case for a No. 1 right now. Maryland could move all the way up to a No. 2 or 3 with an ACC Tournament title. A trip to the final should ensure a top-four seed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Duke (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Maryland (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Florida State (No. 8)</strong><br />
<strong>Clemson (No. 8)</strong><br />
<strong>Wake Forest (No. 9, moved to No. 10 for conference balancing)</strong><br />
Virginia Tech (No. 10, ninth-to-last in)<br />
Georgia Tech (second-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12:</strong> Kansas State&#8217;s home loss to Iowa State on Saturday should all but eliminate the Wildcats from consideration for a No. 1 seed. Meanwhile, Baylor continues to have trouble finding the respect it deserves. The Bears have identical conference and overall records as K-State, and Baylor&#8217;s conference record was achieved against a slightly tougher schedule. Both teams have four wins against top-25 teams, and Baylor has an extra top-100 win. Their RPIs are a spot apart, and yet K-State is a 2 or 3 but Baylor is a 5 or 6? That can&#8217;t be right, and I don&#8217;t think it is. I suspect the committee agrees with me.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Oklahoma State clinched its berth with a blowout win over last-place Nebraska. Texas was dismantled by said Baylor team in Waco and drops to a No. 7 seed with a 9-7 conference mark.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Kansas (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Baylor (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Kansas State (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Texas A&#038;M (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Texas (No. 7)</strong><br />
<strong>Oklahoma State (No. 7)</strong><br />
<strong>Missouri (No. 8)</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East:</strong> Syracuse&#8217;s loss to Louisville clinched the Cardinals&#8217; bid without hurting Syracuse severely. The Orange is still locked into a No. 1 seed and has a shot at the top overall spot should it win the Big East Tournament and Kansas not win the Big 12. West Virginia has emerged as the strongest No. 2 seed after its overtime win at Villanova. WVU could nab the last No. 1 from Duke should the Mountaineers advance further in their conference tournament. I still have Villanova as a solid No. 2, though I see some have dropped the Wildcats to a No. 3. With the main competition coming from Pittsburgh, New Mexico, Purdue and Ohio State &#8212; and three of those five teams getting No. 2&#8217;s &#8212; I suspect VU is in fine shape for now.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The biggest Big East news of the weekend came from Milwaukee where Notre Dame defeated Marquette. The Irish are on the edge of a berth and may make the field even with a pre-quarters loss to the winner of Seton Hall-Providence. That game could be a play-in game for Seton Hall, which defeated Providence on the road this weekend. It would be SHU&#8217;s second win over UND and might be the Big East&#8217;s best shot at a ninth bid. On the other hand, USF is also in the mix after defeating UConn on Saturday. Dominique Jones&#8217; boys will play DePaul before getting a shot at Georgetown. A win over the Hoyas &#8212; which would be USF&#8217;s second this season &#8212; would make the Bulls hard to keep out.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As for Connecticut, some are saying that the Huskies need two wins in New York, but I&#8217;m not sure defeats of St. John&#8217;s and Marquette will be enough. I think three is the number, which means UConn would need to also down Villanova on Thursday.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Syracuse (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>West Virginia (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Villanova (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Pittsburgh (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Georgetown (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Louisville (No. 8)</strong><br />
<strong>Marquette (No. 10, moved to No. 9 for conference balancing)</strong><br />
Notre Dame (No. 10, 10th-to-last in)<br />
Seton Hall (fourth-to-last out)<br />
South Florida (sixth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten:</strong> Illinois is out right now. With an RPI of 77, the Illini can play their way back to the bubble with a win over Wisconsin in the quarterfinals of the Big Ten Tournament on Friday. Sunday&#8217;s 15-point home loss was as bad as it gets and the second time in a row that the Illini were a no-show against one of the Big Ten&#8217;s top four at home.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ohio State will be one of the interesting seeding decisions on Selection Sunday. The Buckeyes are now 13-2 in their last 15 games with wins over Purdue, Wisconsin, Illinois (twice) and Michigan State. Their only losses were at home to Purdue and at West Virginia. The question is how much the selection committee will discount the losses OSU suffered in Turner&#8217;s absence. The Buckeyes were 3-3 in those six games, but there&#8217;s no guarantee they would have won at Butler (eight-point loss) and at Wisconsin (22-point loss) even with Turner (the other loss was at Michigan by nine). This is something I&#8217;ll be mulling considerably over the next week. I don&#8217;t think the committee will give OSU a benefit of the doubt all the way to a No. 1 seed, but a No. 2 seed seems likely if OSU advances to the Big Ten final or wins it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Purdue (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Ohio State (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Wisconsin (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Michigan State (No. 4)</strong><br />
Illinois (fifth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mountain West:</strong> New Mexico is a No. 2 seed. Color me uncomfortable with that. I&#8217;m assuming a couple of major-conference teams will pass the Lobos this week, but what if they win the Mountain West Tournament? At that point, Steve Alford&#8217;s club would be 31-3 with a 5-0 record against the RPI top 25. Brigham Young could play its way to as high as a No. 3 seed by winning the MWC Tourney. I think a 4 or a 5 would fit nicely should BYU make it to at least the final, but there is stiff competition for those spots.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On the bubble, UNLV isn&#8217;t doing much, but not much is more than enough with teams falling around it. If the Rebels can win their quarterfinal game against Utah on Thursday then they should be in. The Aztecs have Colorado State in the quarters before a shot at New Mexico. Getting to the final should clinch a bid for SDSU, but even losing in the semis may be enough, though I doubt it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mountain West Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>New Mexico (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Brigham Young (No. 6)</strong><br />
UNLV (No. 11, eighth-to-last in)<br />
San Diego State (No. 12, second-to-last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10:</strong> Oh, my! Dick Enberg will be in Los Angeles for the Pac-10 Tournament, and suddenly this year&#8217;s dead horse of major-conference basketball has a chance to showcase teams with legitimate NCAA Tournament hopes. Cal, Washington and Arizona State all got out of the final weekend unscathed, and they are all in the field for now. I maintain that Cal is in if it avoids a quarterfinal loss to either Oregon or Washington State. I&#8217;m growing more and more certain that should Washington or Arizona State reach the Pac-10 final, that team would also be in. Despite having the better conference record, ASU is probably less likely to make the NCAAs than Washington because the Sun Devils have just one top-50 win and three top-100 wins. The Huskies two top-25 wins and six top-100 wins.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>California (No. 9)<br />
Washington (No. 12, third-to-last in)<br />
Arizona State (No. 13, last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC:</strong> Kentucky surely locked up a No. 1 seed with its win over Florida on Sunday. Now the Wildcats have a chance at the top overall seed if they can win the SEC Tournament. Vanderbilt had a bad loss to South Carolina at home, and that loss moves the Commodores off the top four seed lines. Tennessee might have the most to gain from a deep SEC Tournament run. Even a No. 2 seed is not out of the question with the tournament title.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In most years, Florida &#8212; losers of three straight &#8212; would be in a very tough spot and in need of two SEC Tournament wins to clinch a bid. This year, though, the Gators should get in with a win over Auburn on Thursday. Mississippi will play the winner of Tennessee-LSU (in other words, Tennessee) in the quarters on Friday. A Rebels win would probably seal the deal. If they lose in the quarters, though, then I think they&#8217;re probably going to be on the outside looking in. After a no-show performance against Tennessee on Saturday night, Mississippi State probably needs to reach the SEC Tournament final to have a legitimate shot at a bid. To get there, MSU will likely have to beat Florida and Vanderbilt, which means the Bulldogs will have earned their bid.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Kentucky (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Tennessee (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Vanderbilt (No. 5)</strong><br />
Florida (No. 11, seventh-to-last in)<br />
Mississippi (No. 12, fourth-to-last in)<br />
Mississippi State (ninth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors:</strong> Another year, another second-place Missouri Valley Conference team that will likely be left out of the field. The Shockers have 10 top-100 wins but just one against the top 50 (Northern Iowa at home). In recent seasons, similar profiles were not good enough for Creighton or Illinois State, so I&#8217;m guessing the same will be true of WSU, which rarely shows up on last-teams-out lists for most projectors. I&#8217;ve given the Shockers ample love on mine.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There are two big games for bubble teams tonight in the West Coast Conference and the CAA. Saint Mary&#8217;s plays Gonzaga, and William &#038; Mary plays Old Dominion. Let&#8217;s compare Gonzaga and Old Dominion for a moment. Both have RPIs in the mid-30s. Both have one top-25 win. Gonzaga has two more top-50 wins but ODU equals the Bulldogs in top-100 wins with eight. Gonzaga has one extra bad loss. ODU went 15-3 in a stronger conference than the one in which Gonzaga achieved its 14-2. ODU does have three more losses but also a tougher strength of schedule. Both teams have 25 wins. I&#8217;m not implying that Old Dominion should be ahead of Gonzaga, but how can one team be a No. 5 or 6 seed and the other not get in if it loses its conference tournament final? Surely that&#8217;s not the case. Gonzaga is definitely over-respected in comparison to the other top mid-major teams because of the Zags&#8217; reputation, but I suspect Old Dominion will get in regardless of what happens in Richmond on Monday night.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Butler (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Gonzaga (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Northern Iowa (No. 7)</strong><br />
UTEP (No. 9)<br />
Old Dominion (No. 9)<br />
Utah State (No. 10)<br />
Siena (No. 11)<br />
Memphis (No. 11, sixth-to-last in)<br />
Saint Mary&#8217;s (No. 12, fifth-to-last in)<br />
UAB (last out)<br />
Wichita State (third-to-last out)<br />
William &#038; Mary (eighth-to-last out)<br />
Virginia Commonwealth (10th-to-last out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100308/bracket-junkie-welcoming-four-new-teams-to-the-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bracket Junkie: Bubble squalor nine days out</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100305/bracket-junkie-bubble-squalor-nine-days-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100305/bracket-junkie-bubble-squalor-nine-days-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bracket Junkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Freeman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brigham Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clemson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Leuer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalin Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Majors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Dominion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purdue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Mary's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seton Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syracuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNLV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Villanova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wake Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xavier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





Printable Version of Bracket &#187;
&#160;
Notes: Ohio State was moved from Milwaukee to Providence, and Pittsburgh was moved from Providence to Milwaukee so that Brigham Young could be placed in a pod where the Cougars would be able to avoid a Sunday game. This is the first time I&#8217;ve had to move pod assignments because of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table align="center">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100304.gif"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
<a href="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100304.gif">Printable Version of Bracket &raquo;</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Notes:</strong> Ohio State was moved from Milwaukee to Providence, and Pittsburgh was moved from Providence to Milwaukee so that Brigham Young could be placed in a pod where the Cougars would be able to avoid a Sunday game. This is the first time I&#8217;ve had to move pod assignments because of Brigham Young, and I hope it&#8217;s the last. Also, in the conference bid breakdowns, I am going to put teams I consider locks for the NCAA Tournament in <b>bold</b>. My definition of a lock is a team that could lose out and would still be at least 98-percent likely to get in. Right now, I have 31 teams as locks</strong> plus <strong>22 other bids accounted for by conference champions</strong>. That leaves <strong>12 spots still up for grabs</strong>, though Oklahoma State and Louisville are just about locked in.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Bracketing Challenges:</strong> Kansas slips just past Syracuse and into the top overall seed position after defeating Kansas State on Wednesday. This is very close, however, and the top overall seed will likely come down to who goes further in their conference tournaments. Kentucky could also be in the mix if it wins the SEC Tournament and neither Kansas nor Syracuse wins its conference tournament.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how Duke is not still a No. 1 seed. The Blue Devils have three top-25 wins, same as Kentucky; and nine top-50 wins, four more than Kentucky. Of course, Duke has three more losses than the Wildcats, but is it possible that the difference in losses can be found in the difference between Kentucky&#8217;s 41st-ranked strength of schedule and Duke&#8217;s seventh-ranked one? Yet, Duke is on the No. 2 seed line for some people, and Kentucky is firmly ensconced as a No. 1. Interesting. The Blue Devils&#8217; grip on a top seed is not firm, and a slip-up in the conference tournament could combine with a conference tournament championship for any of a half-dozen teams to knock Duke off the line, but right now, I don&#8217;t find a compelling argument against Duke.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As a whole, I really feel comfortable with the way I&#8217;ve seeded these teams. There are some tricky seedings on lines four through seven, but &#8212; with the exception of the teams I moved up or down for conference balancing, most of the seeds &#8220;feel&#8221; right. Many of you may disagree with that assessment, and feel free to voice your differences in the comments section or via <a href="mailto:brendon@baselinestats.com">e-mail</a>. Nine days to go until Selection Sunday!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as At-large:</strong> Memphis, Rhode Island </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as At-large:</strong> Connecticut, Dayton</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as Automatic:</strong> Jacksonville (Atlantic Sun)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as Automatic:</strong> Belmont (Atlantic Sun)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>On the Bubble:</strong> Though I like the seeding for this projection, the bubble is an absolute mess. Any of the last five in could reasonably be left out. The problem is finding the teams to replace them. Illinois has lost four of five and still can&#8217;t manage to find its way out of the field. Rhode Island dropped four of five before it vaulted back in with a comfortable home win over Charlotte. Memphis enters the field for the first time after a road win over UAB, but the Blazers maintain their spot thanks to a strong non-conference performance and an 11-4 record in the Conference USA. Saint Mary&#8217;s hasn&#8217;t played since Saturday, and that was more than good enough to stay in the field.<span id="more-1864"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On the wrong side of the bubble, a couple of Pac-10 teams are inching closer. Arizona State and Washington both have shots at bids if they reach the conference tournament final. Their potential semifinal matchup in the Pac-10 Tournament could prove vital. San Diego State had a routine home win and actually has a profile similar to UAB&#8217;s, but the Blazers got the nod thanks to a better overall record and two more wins against top-100 opponents. Then there&#8217;s Mississippi with its weak record &#8212; 8-7 &#8212; in the lesser half of the SEC, but the Rebels do have 20 wins against a pretty solid schedule. Connecticut, Mississippi State and Dayton each suffered damaging losses this week. For UConn and UD, the losses ensure conference records that will be eyesores to the committee. For MSU, the loss to a weak opponent &#8212; Auburn &#8212; is the Bulldogs&#8217; fifth against teams outside of the RPI top-100. Set that against Rick Stansbury&#8217;s team&#8217;s one top-50 win. As you can see, determining the most deserving at-large teams was a lot like naming the most reasonable talking head on one of those awful afternoon ESPN shows.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Atlantic 10:</strong> Temple had a very fine win at Saint Louis this week. With that victory, the Owls are one step closer to a share of the A-10 title. Fran Dunphy&#8217;s club could peak at a No. 4 seed with a good run in Atlantic City for the A-10 Tournament. Xavier defeated Fordham and, like Temple, figures to slot somewhere on the 4-6 range. Richmond had a terrific comeback win over Dayton on Thursday, a victory that may have sealed the Flyers&#8217; fate. The Spiders head to a sputtering Charlotte team to play for seeding.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>URI got a win it needed against Charlotte, but it can&#8217;t allow itself to fall at UMass. A home loss to the Minutemen in their last regular-season game a year ago doomed the Rams&#8217; at-large hopes. URI&#8217;s RPI is in the 20s now but is unlikely to stay there without a run to the A-10 final, though it needn&#8217;t get that far to secure a bid. Dayton is the tough-luck team in the nation this year. The Flyers could probably share that honor with Penn State, but the Nittany Lions aren&#8217;t in a fight for an NCAA bid. Brian Gregory&#8217;s team has lost seven straight games decided by five points or fewer &#8212; with a six-point overtime win against Duquesne thrown in. Dayton hosts Saint Louis on Saturday needing a win just to get to 9-7 in conference. That&#8217;s not a league record from the A-10 that will impress many committee members, though St. Joseph&#8217;s got in with a 9-7 record and a run to the A-10 final in 2008. That&#8217;s the task for the Flyers.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Atlantic 10 Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Temple (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Xavier (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Richmond (No. 7, moved to No. 8 for conference balancing)</strong><br />
Rhode Island (No. 12, moved to No. 11 for conference balancing; fifth-to-last in)<br />
Dayton (eighth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC:</strong> Home wins this week for Clemson and Florida State locked in a winning conference record for both teams. The losses for Georgia Tech and Wake Forest have dropped both teams into improbably precarious positions. Georgia Tech hosts Virginia Tech this weekend, and Wake Forest hosts Clemson. GaTech needs a win just to get to .500 in conference, and the Demon Deacons are desperate to stop a slide that has reached four straight. The good news is that the bubble is so weak that both teams still maintain a margin for error.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Virginia Tech halted a three-game losing streak with a home win over NC State on Wednesday, but the Hokies now travel to Georgia Tech where a loss would drop VT closer to the cutline. Still, a 9-7 record in the ACC &#8212; that&#8217;s where the Hokies would be with a loss in Atlanta &#8212; is probably stronger than what most of the teams near the bubble will be able to show to the committee, despite just two top-50 wins.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Maryland&#8217;s seed is starting to fall better in line with its play now that the Terps have defeated Duke. Maryland now has six top-50 wins.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Duke (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Maryland (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Clemson (No. 7)</strong><br />
<strong>Florida State (No. 8)</strong><br />
Georgia Tech (No. 10)<br />
Wake Forest (No. 10, 10th-to-last in)<br />
Virginia Tech (No. 11, sixth-to-last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12:</strong> I nearly bolded Oklahoma State, but a Cowboys loss to Nebraska in Stillwater on Saturday followed by a first-round Big 12 Tournament loss next week could conceivably put OSU in jeopardy. A win over the Cornhuskers will remove all doubt.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I still see Baylor, Texas A&#038;M and Texas as being underseeded in many projections. It doesn&#8217;t seem that many people understand just how strong the Big 12 is this year. Do a side-by-side comparison of Vanderbilt and Baylor&#8217;s qualifications and tell me how they can be 2-3 seed lines apart. Also, I think Texas is suffering from bad public relations. Because the Longhorns aren&#8217;t No. 1-seed good, they&#8217;re being dropped down further than they should. This is still a 23-7 team with five wins against top-50 teams and nine against top-100 teams without a single loss to a team outside the top 100.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Kansas (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Kansas State (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Baylor (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Texas A&#038;M (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Texas (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Missouri (No. 7)</strong><br />
Oklahoma State (No. 8, moved to No. 7 for conference balancing)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East:</strong> The winner of Saturday&#8217;s West Virginia-Villanova matchup has the inside track at unseating Duke for the last No. 1 seed. A WVU loss would give Villanova a sweep, making it more difficult for the committee to slot the Mountaineers over the Wildcats even if WVU outperforms Villanova at the Big East Tournament. Pittsburgh stays firmly on the No. 3 seed line thanks to Ashton Gibbs&#8217; 30-foot game-winner against Providence. A Pittsburgh win over Rutgers combined with a WVU win at Nova would create a three-way tie for second place in the Big East, and the Panthers would win the tiebreaker. Should that happen, Pitt would be a No. 2 seed in the Big East Tournament for the second straight year, despite all the personnel losses from last season.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Georgetown has now lost two straight as well as one of its top players in Austin Freeman. The assumption is that Freeman will be back for the Big East Tournament, if not sooner, but that&#8217;s not a guarantee for the junior recently diagnosed with diabetes. Marquette continues to rise, this time after a dominant victory over Louisville. I&#8217;m going to leave the Cardinals off the list of locks. They are just a spot ahead of Wake Forest in my at-large model and have just three top-50 wins.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Notre Dame might clinch a bid with a win at Marquette on Saturday, though the Golden Eagles have lost just once since Jan. 23. Short of a road victory, Notre Dame will need a win and probably two at Madison Square Garden to boost an RPI that currently sits at 63. UConn has to win at USF and then likely add two more at MSG to secure a bid. The best the Huskies can do is 8-10 in conference, and that will be hard for the committee to ignore, regardless of how difficult their schedule has been. USF and Seton Hall continued to stay within reach of the field thanks to road victories over the two worst teams in the Big East. Both teams need to win until Thursday&#8217;s Big East quarterfinals, and then we&#8217;ll see where each stands if that happens.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Syracuse (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>West Virginia (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Villanova (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Pittsburgh (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Georgetown (No. 5)</strong><br />
<strong>Marquette (No. 8)</strong><br />
Louisville (No. 9)<br />
Notre Dame (No. 11, moved to No. 12 for conference balancing; seventh-to-last in)<br />
Connecticut (fifth-to-last out)<br />
Seton Hall (seventh-to-last out)<br />
South Florida (10th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten:</strong> Purdue, Ohio State and Michigan State appear likely to finish 14-4 in conference with Wisconsin a step behind. All four teams have played portions of the season without their best players. Of course, Purdue is the only team that will continue to play that way. These four teams may look similar, but let&#8217;s keep in mind how many top-50 wins each has: Purdue, 6; Ohio State, 5; Wisconsin, 6; Michigan State, 3. Also, MSU lost Kalin Lucas for just one full game. On the other hand, Evan Turner missed six, and Jon Leuer missed nine. Just some things to think about.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>At the bubble, Illinois continues to hang around, but I&#8217;m not sure the Illini can survive a home loss to Wisconsin. The Illini&#8217;s RPI will be in the 70s with a loss, and I doubt their quality wins can overcome an 18-13 record (plus a loss in the Big Ten Tournament) with that RPI. Minnesota, meanwhile, is done. Twenty-eight point losses to teams going nowhere tend to do that to a team. I suppose that the Gophers could be in the mix with a run to the Big Ten final, but let me know when that happens.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Purdue (No. 2)</strong><br />
<strong>Ohio State (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Wisconsin (No. 4)</strong><br />
<strong>Michigan State (No. 5)</strong><br />
Illinois (No. 13, last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mountain West:</strong> The Lobos continued to do what they do &#8212; win by less than one would expect but win nonetheless. This time, it was a seven-point home win against seventh-place TCU, New Mexico&#8217;s 14th straight win. Steve Alford&#8217;s team may not be that good, but it sure does win a lot, and I figure that will be rewarded. I&#8217;m less comfortable with Brigham Young as a No. 6, as I could see the Cougars higher. BYU, though, is just 4-4 vs. the top 50 without a top-25 win.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>UNLV is one of the primary beneficiaries of the weak bubble. Last season, the three straight February losses might have doomed the Rebels, but they still look fairly comfortable this season. Lon Kruger&#8217;s bunch will close the season with Wyoming at home before hosting the Mountain West Tournament. Two more wins should be enough. San Diego State is basically UNLV with two fewer quality wins, and that makes all the difference. SDSU needs to close out the season with a win at Air Force and probably reach the MWC final to get in. Although, that appeared to be the formula last March as well, and it didn&#8217;t work out (unjustly, I&#8217;d maintain).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mountain West Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>New Mexico (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Brigham Young (No. 6)</strong><br />
UNLV (No. 11, eighth-to-last in)<br />
San Diego State (second-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10:</strong> I won&#8217;t put Cal as a lock yet, but I&#8217;m definitely more bullish on the Bears than most. Assuming Cal finishes out the regular season with a win at Stanford and avoids an upset in the Pac-10 quarterfinals, I think the Bears will be in. Washington and Arizona State have been helped by the bubble slippage. ASU has now won seven of nine with its only losses being at Washington and at Cal. Washington has won three straight after the disappointing home defeat to USC. The Huskies&#8217; two wins over RPI top-25 teams &#8212; Texas A&#038;M and Cal at home &#8212; give them the edge over ASU despite the Sun Devils&#8217; superior conference record. The committee has been generous with Pac-10 bubble teams in the past, and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it gives the nod to one of these two next Sunday.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>California (No. 9)<br />
Washington (last out)<br />
Arizona State (third-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC:</strong> Vanderbilt just edged out Baylor for the last No. 3 seed primarily due to that strong, 12-3 conference record, though I&#8217;m not convinced that Baylor&#8217;s 10-5 in the Big 12 South is substantively worse. Tennessee got the nod on the No. 4 line, though I could see any number of teams ahead of the Vols here, particularly Maryland, Temple or Michigan State. Either way, both teams are in and &#8212; along with UK &#8212; will see to it that the SEC&#8217;s stay in the NCAA Tournament is longer this year than last.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Florida, like Wake Forest, has failed to move closer to the bubble despite recent losses. The Gators now head to Kentucky. If they don&#8217;t win there, they can ill afford to lose their first-round SEC Tournament game, which will likely come against a tricky Auburn or Alabama club. Mississippi and Mississippi State are hanging around, the latter despite a damaging road loss to Auburn on Wednesday. MSU <i>must</i> beat Tennessee at home this weekend to have a shot. As for the Rebels, they do have that neutral-court win over Kansas State in November, but then there&#8217;s the 8-7 conference record and the sweep at the hands of Mississippi State. Andy Kennedy&#8217;s team visits Arkansas this weekend. A win there will be the first of several steps toward an at-large.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Kentucky (No. 1)</strong><br />
<strong>Vanderbilt (No. 3)</strong><br />
<strong>Tennessee (No. 4)</strong><br />
Florida (No. 11, ninth-to-last in)<br />
Mississippi (fourth-to-last out)<br />
Mississippi State (sixth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors:</strong> With the bubble so weak as it stands, I&#8217;m convinced that teams like Northern Iowa, Utah State, UTEP and Old Dominion have terrific shots at at-large bids if they lose in their conference tournaments. There aren&#8217;t as many major-conference teams with qualifications to steal bids from teams that dominated mid-major leagues like these teams did all season.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The worrisome thing about the bubble for mid-major teams right now is that so many of them are just barely on the positive side of it. UAB, Memphis, Saint Mary&#8217;s and Rhode Island are all among the last five in. We&#8217;ve seen in recent seasons, with the omissions of Illinois State, Creighton, San Diego State and Saint Mary&#8217;s, among others, that the committee can be unforgiving with the little guy.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Butler (No. 6)</strong><br />
<strong>Gonzaga (No. 7)</strong><br />
Northern Iowa (No. 8)<br />
Utah State (No. 9)<br />
UTEP (No. 9)<br />
Old Dominion (No. 10)<br />
Siena (No. 10)<br />
Memphis (No. 12, fourth-to-last in)<br />
UAB (No. 12, third-to-last in)<br />
Saint Mary&#8217;s (No. 12, second-to-last in)<br />
Wichita State (ninth-to-last out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100305/bracket-junkie-bubble-squalor-nine-days-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bracket Junkie: Big Ten injuries likely to affect seeds</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100226/bracket-junkie-big-ten-injuries-likely-to-affect-seeds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100226/bracket-junkie-big-ten-injuries-likely-to-affect-seeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bracket Junkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brigham Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clemson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalin Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purdue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robbie Hummel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Mary's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seton Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. John's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNLV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Villanova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xavier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=1833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





Printable Version of Bracket &#187;
&#160;
Bracketing Challenges: I&#8217;ll discuss the biggest challenge &#8212; finding the final at-large team &#8212; in the &#8220;On the Bubble&#8221; section below. As far as seeding challenges, the Big Ten&#8217;s penchant for major injuries is causing a lot of ambiguity. Injuries to Purdue&#8217;s Robbie Hummel, Ohio State&#8217;s Evan Turner and Michigan State&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table align="center">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100225.gif"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
<a href="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100225.gif">Printable Version of Bracket &raquo;</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Bracketing Challenges:</strong> I&#8217;ll discuss the biggest challenge &#8212; finding the final at-large team &#8212; in the &#8220;On the Bubble&#8221; section below. As far as seeding challenges, the Big Ten&#8217;s penchant for major injuries is causing a lot of ambiguity. Injuries to Purdue&#8217;s Robbie Hummel, Ohio State&#8217;s Evan Turner and Michigan State&#8217;s Kalin Lucas are all likely to affect their teams&#8217; seeding. In this projection, Purdue gets bumped down to a No. 2 seed after word that Hummel will miss the remainder of the season with a torn ACL suffered at Minnesota on Wednesday. Lucas is back now, of course, but Michigan State lost the game that Lucas was injured in, the game he missed and the game in which he came back. I think the Spartans are being given too large a benefit of the doubt, as MSU lost by 18 to Wisconsin in the game in which Lucas was injured and by 12 at home to Purdue in the game in which he returned, but they move from a No. 6 to a No. 5 because of that injury. Finally, Ohio State lost three of six when Turner was injured, but is 12-3 since his return. OSU gets a bump from a No. 5 to a No. 3. It&#8217;s educated guesswork at this point.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as At-large:</strong> (none)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as At-large:</strong> (none)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as Automatic:</strong> (none)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as Automatic:</strong> (none)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>On the Bubble:</strong> This was the toughest time I&#8217;ve had this season filling out the field. Thirty-three of the 34 at-large bids were easy to find, but the last team proved elusive. My model showed only five teams with a legitimate case &#8212; Charlotte, Cincinnati, Saint Mary&#8217;s, San Diego State and Seton Hall. Charlotte and Cincy actually rated out highest, but SDSU&#8217;s strong RPI (37) and recent play put the Aztecs in. The Bearcats continue to have an underrated profile thanks to non-conference wins over Maryland and Vanderbilt. Their four wins against RPI top-50 teams &#8212; which includes a sweep of UConn &#8212; are more than any other team under consideration. With wins over Gonzaga and Kansas out of conference, Arizona squeaked in last season despite losing five of its last six, including a first-round Pac-10 Tournament loss after a 9-9 conference season. Cincinnati could be this year&#8217;s Arizona, only with a finish that’s easier for the committee to stomach.<span id="more-1833"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Atlantic 10:</strong> I&#8217;m seeing Xavier seeded much lower than No. 5 in most projections, but it&#8217;s difficult to understand why. The Musketeers are 11-2 in a strong A-10 with a recent road win against Florida. The 0-5 record against RPI top-25 teams is an eyesore, but the 9-2 record against all other top-100 teams is superb, and XU has no bad losses. By comparison, BYU has no top-25 wins but is seeded &#8212; on average &#8212; two lines higher. Xavier hosts Richmond &#8212; also 11-2 in the A-10 &#8212; for a showdown on Saturday.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Temple won ugly on Wednesday, 49-41, over Dayton to join Xavier and Richmond atop the league. The loss kept the Owls&#8217; A-10 title hopes alive with trips to La Salle and Saint Louis on the horizon. The loss for Dayton was its third straight on the road, and the Flyers are now putting themselves in a precarious position. They host UMass and Saint Louis with a trip to Richmond sandwiched in between. They&#8217;d do well to sweep those games or will head to Atlantic City for the A-10 Tournament with work to do.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The other two A-10 teams nearest the bubble &#8212; Rhode Island and Charlotte &#8212; are coming off wins against A-10 bottom-feeders and face tougher road tests this weekend. URI heads to Saint Bonaventure and Charlotte visits GW. Consider wins for both teams necessities.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Atlantic 10 Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Temple (No. 5)<br />
Xavier (No. 5)<br />
Richmond (No. 7)<br />
Rhode Island (No. 12, third-to-last in)<br />
Dayton (No. 12, second-to-last in)<br />
Charlotte (second-to-last out)<br />
Saint Louis</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC:</strong> While Maryland continues to show why it is the second best team in the ACC, Georgia Tech, Virginia Tech and Clemson continue to flirt with disaster. After losing to Boston College by 20, VaTech is the most at risk of those three despite having the best conference mark at 8-5. The Hokies have played the easiest conference schedule in the ACC to date. By chance, VT was handed a schedule that saw it face the six other NCAA likelies just once each and facing the five non-NCAA teams twice each. The Selection Committee could and should factor that in if Virginia Tech doesn&#8217;t manage to finish better than 9-7 in conference. Saturday&#8217;s home matchup with Maryland will be crucial for Seth Greenberg&#8217;s team.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Clemson and Georgia Tech are in better shape because of more top-50 wins and tougher schedules, but it would benefit both to finish strong and get to nine wins in conference, though eight wins should be enough. Wake Forest and Florida State are pretty close to locks at this point if they aren&#8217;t already, and Maryland is playing for seeding as well.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The other team in need of mention is the conference&#8217;s best team, Duke, which hops on to the No. 1 seed line for the first time, in place of the Hummel-less Boilermakers. The Blue Devils would have had a very strong case regardless of what happened with Purdue, though the four losses were keeping them on the No. 2 seed line. Duke is 8-1 against teams ranked from 26-50 in the RPI, but it has just one win against a top-25 team. Purdue and Kansas State &#8212; each with 4-1 records against the RPI top 25 &#8212; are poised to jump to that No. 1 line. If the Boilermakers are able to defeat Michigan State this weekend, they are likely to jump back up regardless of what Duke does in Charlottesville.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Duke (No. 1)<br />
Maryland (No. 7)<br />
Florida State (No. 7)<br />
Wake Forest (No. 8)<br />
Clemson (No. 9)<br />
Georgia Tech (No. 9, moved to No. 10 for conference balancing)<br />
Virginia Tech (No. 11, fifth-to-last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12:</strong> Barring a collapse, these seven are playing for seeding, and no one else is joining the party. Kansas and Kansas State continue to win, as neither has lost since their last meeting on Jan. 30. Missouri, Texas, Baylor and Texas A&#038;M figure to get to at least 10-6 in a strong Big 12 and achieve solid seeds with those records. One team that confuses me is Baylor. The Bears are 21-6 with three wins against the top 25 and six against the top 50, yet their average <a href="http://bracketproject.50webs.com/matrix.htm" target="_blank">Bracket Matrix</a> seed is a No. 6. Nothing but name recognition could put Michigan State ahead of Baylor in any bracket.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Oklahoma State stumbled in the second game of its difficult stretch, which was no surprise against the much bigger Longhorns. OSU now hosts Kansas before visiting Texas A&#038;M. If the Cowboys can get to 9-7 in conference, they are a lock (they&#8217;re 7-6 now). If they fall to 8-8, I still think they&#8217;ll be in good shape &#8212; much like a Clemson or Georgia Tech out of the ACC &#8212; but they might want to win a game or two in the Big 12 Tournament to avoid sweaty palms on Selection Sunday.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Kansas (No. 1)<br />
Kansas State (No. 2)<br />
Baylor (No. 4)<br />
Texas (No. 4)<br />
Missouri (No. 6)<br />
Texas A&#038;M (No. 7)<br />
Oklahoma State (No. 8)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East:</strong> Five Big East teams continue to hop around on the top three seed lines, but it&#8217;s looking less and less likely that the league will secure a second No. 1 seed. West Virginia&#8217;s loss to UConn all but closes the door on the Mountaineers&#8217; shot at a top seed, though Villanova will push Duke, Purdue and Kansas State should the Wildcats go up to Syracuse and win on Saturday night. Pittsburgh falls to a No. 3 after a bad loss at Notre Dame, but the Panthers shouldn&#8217;t fall further, although I&#8217;m sure they will in many projections.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>UConn&#8217;s home win over West Virginia was obviously a crucial one, but that 7-8 conference record means the Huskies are not home free yet. They host Louisville on Sunday in a game that figures to put either team in very good shape. The Cardinals blew a halftime lead at home against Georgetown on Tuesday, which drops them back into the last 10 in. Marquette&#8217;s comeback and overtime victory at St. John&#8217;s was a necessity for Buzz Williams&#8217; team. The Golden Eagles now visit Seton Hall in a game that is big for both teams, especially the Pirates. Many are ignoring Bobby Gonzalez&#8217;s bunch, but SHU has now won four of five and has three winnable games remaining. The Pirates are in need of the quality victory a win over MU would provide.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Notre Dame continues to hang around. Even without Luke Harangody, the Irish drilled Pittsburgh on Wednesday to get to 7-8 in conference. If they can come out on the other end of their brutal upcoming schedule &#8212; at Georgetown, Connecticut, at Marquette &#8212; with two wins, they will be under serious consideration.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Syracuse (No. 1)<br />
Villanova (No. 2)<br />
West Virginia (No. 2)<br />
Georgetown (No. 3)<br />
Pittsburgh (No. 3)<br />
Connecticut (No. 9)<br />
Louisville (No. 10, moved to No. 9 for conference balancing; eighth-to-last in)<br />
Marquette (No. 11, moved to No. 12 for conference balancing; sixth-to-last in)<br />
Cincinnati (last out)<br />
Seton Hall (fourth-to-last out)<br />
Notre Dame (sixth-to-last out)<br />
South Florida (13th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten:</strong>  Illinois is <i>not</i> safe even after defeating Michigan in Ann Arbor in an ugly contest on Tuesday. The Illini are now 10-5 in conference, but I&#8217;m convinced they need two more wins among their last three games and the Big Ten Tournament to make the field. Illinois hosts Minnesota on Saturday before traveling to Ohio State and then hosting Wisconsin. There&#8217;s a good chance that Illinois gets either Michigan State or Wisconsin in the quarterfinals of the Big Ten Tournament. A 1-3 finish shouldn&#8217;t be good enough. It may seem strange if indeed the Big Ten gets only four teams when all four are seeded on the top five seed lines, but there is a recent precedent. Last season, the Big East got seven teams, all seeded No. 6 or better. West Virginia was No. 6 and had a 10-8 conference record, the same as Providence, which did not make the field.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Purdue-Minnesota game was devastating for both sides. Purdue, of course, lost Hummel for the season, and Minnesota&#8217;s defeat probably eliminates it from at-large consideration.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Purdue (No. 2)<br />
Ohio State (No. 3)<br />
Wisconsin (No. 4)<br />
Michigan State (No. 5)<br />
Illinois (No. 12, moved to No. 11 seed for conference balancing; fourth-to-last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mountain West:</strong> San Diego State&#8217;s hold on a bid is tenuous at best, but UNLV has slipped into the last 10 out as well. In their last five games, the Rebels have lost three times and won at home against mediocre opponents &#8212; Colorado State and Texas Christian. Lon Kruger&#8217;s club will finish the season with Air Force and Wyoming, meaning UNLV is short on chances to make a late impression. The Feb. 6 win over BYU will be more than five weeks old when the committee unveils its bracket, so UNLV would do well to get a quality win in the conference tournament.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>New Mexico continues to underwhelm <a href=”http://basketballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=940” target=”_blank”>John Gasaway</a>, but the Lobos also continue to do what they set out to do in each game: win. They have 12 straight victories after starting 0-2 in conference. The showdown is on Saturday in Provo where New Mexico hopes to clinch the regular-season title with a sweep of Brigham Young. New Mexico is being seeded anywhere from 2-5, and BYU is being seeded anywhere from 3-6. Saturday&#8217;s result might help clarify that.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mountain West Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>New Mexico (No. 3)<br />
Brigham Young (No. 5)<br />
UNLV (No. 10, 10th-to-last in)<br />
San Diego State (No. 13, last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10:</strong> After defeating Arizona, 95-71, in Berkeley on Thursday night, the Cal Bears have won five of six with all five wins coming by at least 12 points (and the loss as well). There&#8217;s still talk of Cal being left out if it loses in the Pac-10 Tournament, but with each dominant victory, the Bears are becoming harder and harder to omit. Along with it being unheard of for a major-conference regular-season champion to be left out of the field, Cal also has a very strong RPI (23) and strength of schedule (11) on its side. Not on Cal&#8217;s side are zero top-50 wins and no more chances to get one. It&#8217;s difficult to get in as an at-large without a top-50 win. A strong finish from Washington would help Cal, since that&#8217;s the Bears&#8217; best win. Right now, in my at-large model, Cal is hanging around Marquette and Rhode Island.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Arizona State and Washington continue to be among the last 10 out, but both will have trouble adding to their lists of quality wins. ASU does have a shot at a big one when it visits Cal on Saturday, though that&#8217;s a Catch-22 for the league. A Cal loss might put the Bears in trouble for an at-large bid while vaulting ASU into the last few in. I still maintain that the Pac-10 will get two teams if Cal does not win the conference tournament, but it&#8217;s going to be close.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>California (No. 9)<br />
Arizona State (fifth-to-last out)<br />
Washington (seventh-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC:</strong> I&#8217;ve already given detailed thoughts on what I think about <a href="http://www.baselinestats.com/20100225/including-mississippi-state-in-your-bracket-projection-is-madness/">Mississippi State&#8217;s inclusion</a> on some brackets, so I won&#8217;t belabor the point. Florida, on the other hand, has recovered from what at the time looked like a very damaging home loss to Xavier. With a win at Mississippi and at home to Tennessee, Florida is in good position. Still, that trip to Georgia looks scary, and finishing at home against Vandy and then at Kentucky will be difficult. Two wins in three will surely get the Gators in, but those two wins may be hard to come by.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A 2-1 finish to the conference season should be enough to lock in a No. 1 seed for Kentucky regardless of what happens at the SEC Tournament. The Wildcats have played their best basketball since losing at South Carolina, winning eight straight by an average margin of 12.5 points. The other two locks in the SEC &#8212; Vanderbilt and Tennessee &#8212; have been leaking oil of late. After being unable to hit a shot in the home loss to Kentucky, the Commodores couldn&#8217;t stop Georgia&#8217;s offense but managed to win in overtime on Thursday. With trips to Arkansas and Florida ahead, VU better get things righted or the seed could fall. Tennessee has now lost three of five after falling at Florida on Tuesday. The Vols&#8217; offense has only broken the 1.00-PPP threshold three times in its last 12 games. Tennessee hosts Kentucky on Saturday.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Kentucky (No. 1)<br />
Vanderbilt (No. 4)<br />
Tennessee (No. 6)<br />
Florida (No. 10, ninth-to-last in)<br />
Mississippi State (eighth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors:</strong> Northern Iowa had a pretty damaging loss to previously conference-winless Evansville this week. UNI still looks like a pretty solid at-large candidate assuming the Panthers reach the Missouri Valley Tournament final.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>With its 11th straight win in Hattiesburg on Wednesday, UTEP is looking more and more like a potential at-large team if the Miners don&#8217;t take the C-USA Tournament. They rate out about the same as Cal in my at-large model. Besides a home win over Butler, UAB has a pretty thin résumé, which means upcoming matchups with Memphis and UTEP will be critical for Mike Davis&#8217; team. Memphis probably played itself out of serious at-large consideration with a 17-point loss at Houston on Wednesday.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One other mid-major to note is Utah State. The Aggies have now won 13 straight to move to 25-6 overall and 14-2 in the WAC. With an early-season 10-point win over BYU in their back pocket, they&#8217;re setting themselves up for serious at-large consideration should they fall short in the WAC Tournament.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Butler (No. 6)<br />
Gonzaga (No. 6)<br />
Northern Iowa (No. 8)<br />
Utah State (No. 8)<br />
UTEP (No. 10)<br />
UAB (No. 11, seventh-to-last in)<br />
Old Dominion (No. 11)<br />
Siena (No. 12)<br />
Saint Mary&#8217;s (third-to-last out)<br />
Virginia Commonwealth (ninth-to-last out)<br />
Memphis (10th-to-last out)<br />
William &#038; Mary (11th-to-last out)<br />
Wichita State (12th-to-last out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100226/bracket-junkie-big-ten-injuries-likely-to-affect-seeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bracket Junkie: Plenty of posturing, no changes in at-large field</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100219/bracket-junkie-plenty-of-posturing-no-changes-in-at-large-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100219/bracket-junkie-plenty-of-posturing-no-changes-in-at-large-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bracket Junkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clemson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mid-Majors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Dominion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purdue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seton Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Cal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Mary's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William & Mary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=1798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





Printable Version of Bracket &#187;
&#160;
Bracketing Challenges: There were a couple of challenges I want to make note of, the first coming at the end of the No. 3 seedline. The battle here was between Vanderbilt and Baylor, who have very similar profiles. Both teams are 19-5 and have two wins against the RPI top 25. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table align="center">
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100218.gif"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>
<a href="http://www.baselinestats.com/images/bracket/20100218.gif">Printable Version of Bracket &raquo;</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Bracketing Challenges:</strong> There were a couple of challenges I want to make note of, the first coming at the end of the No. 3 seedline. The battle here was between Vanderbilt and Baylor, who have very similar profiles. Both teams are 19-5 and have two wins against the RPI top 25. I went with the Commodores primarily because their two top-25 wins come in just three chances. Also, their conference RPI is 3. Only Kansas (1) and Duke (2) are ranked higher for play within the conference.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The other thing I wanted to address is Wake Forest. After the Demon Deacons&#8217; loss to Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, I dropped them from a No. 5 to a No. 7, which is quite harsh. Wake ranks 23rd in my BTI seed model, which should equate to a No. 6 seed. However, Butler and Ohio State rate out on the No. 7 seedline, and I feel like both would surely be higher than that right now. So, I bumped the Bears and Buckeyes to No. 6&#8217;s at the expense of Richmond and Wake Forest. One could argue that Xavier &#8212; which is ranked 21st in the model &#8212; should have been the one to get bumped down, and I wouldn&#8217;t put up too much resistance in my rebuttal. I just didn&#8217;t go in that direction.<span id="more-1798"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as At-large:</strong> (None)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as At-large:</strong> (None)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving In as Automatic:</strong> North Texas (Sun Belt)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Moving Out as Automatic:</strong> Arkansas State (Sun Belt)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>On the Bubble:</strong> As we&#8217;ve seen in the past few years, bubble teams continue to weaken themselves as the Tournament nears, and the case was no different this time. I&#8217;m going to spend this section &#8212; and most of the breakdown &#8212; addressing both the five teams I put in that some may not think deserve it along with the handful of teams that didn&#8217;t get in but might be included in some projections.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Rhode Island:</strong> You must forgive Rams fans for the feeling of déjà vu pervading Kingston after a third straight loss on Wednesday. URI traveled to a tough Saint Louis team (now in our last 20 out) and fell by five. On its own, that wouldn&#8217;t mean much, but when one combines that with the previous 22-point loss at Temple and a killer, two-point home defeat to Richmond, it looks bad. My at-large model, though, still likes Jim Baron&#8217;s club a lot, ranking them 23rd of the teams eligible for at-larges (top 34 make the field). URI&#8217;s non-conference RPI is still seventh, but that figure will become less and less important as the conference season takes up a higher proportion of the schedule.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Two years ago, URI started 20-4 and finished 1-7 with two losses to Charlotte to end the season. Last season, URI was 22-8 and 11-4 in conference before losing at home to a poor UMass team and then in the A-10 Tournament first round to Duquesne. The Rams need to start winning to make sure history doesn&#8217;t repeat itself. That start should be easy with a home game against Fordham on Saturday. After that, trips to St. Bonaventure and UMass sandwiched around a visit from Charlotte will each be tricky.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>William &#038; Mary:</strong> The Tribe continues to make my field while hardly anyone else has W&#038;M in. William &#038; Mary won its fourth straight with a road victory against George Mason on Tuesday. W&#038;M looks a strong bet to finish the season with three more wins &#8212; though Friday&#8217;s Bracket Buster at Iona will be tricky. Those three wins plus a couple more in the CAA Tournament might get the Tribe in thanks mainly to non-conference victories over Richmond and Maryland. Any slip-up before then probably means that William &#038; Mary won&#8217;t be dancing.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Cincinnati:</strong> The Bearcats continue to rate out well in my model because of their strong play out of conference, which included wins over Maryland and Vanderbilt. In conference, the story has been much bleaker with UC dropping to 6-7 after a loss at USF on Tuesday. Cincy&#8217;s best conference wins are at home to USF and UConn plus the 12-point win at UConn last Saturday. Cincinnati has a tough schedule to wrap up the season, starting at home against fellow bubble team Marquette this Sunday. The winner of that game may have an inside shot at the Big East&#8217;s seventh bid since the two teams have a combined 3-0 record against the Big East team closest to the bubble &#8212; UConn. UC does have a dastardly finish to its schedule with trips to West Virginia and Georgetown sandwiched around a visit from Villanova. A 9-9 conference mark should put the Bearcats in good position but would require them to beat Marquette and one of the top teams on their remaining schedule.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Saint Mary&#8217;s:</strong> It was a difficult weekend for the Gaels in the Pacific-Northwest last week with losses at Gonzaga and Portland. SMC has followed that up with a victory at San Diego. The Gaels, like many of the mid-major teams currently making the field, are in worse shape than their major-conference rivals because they have nearly run out of chances to improve their standing. With the loss in Spokane, SMC squandered its last good shot to get an eye-popping win. SMC&#8217;s best wins to date are against San Diego State, Utah State and Northeastern. Should St. Mary&#8217;s finish out the season with two more wins and advance to the conference final, it will be close to a bid, but that will also depend on poor finishes by other bubble teams.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Charlotte:</strong> I suspect Charlotte won&#8217;t make many projections after Thursday&#8217;s home loss to Duquesne, and it&#8217;s easy to see why. The 49ers have now dropped two straight after racing to 8-1 in the Atlantic 10. Charlotte, though, still had three wins against top-50 teams and no losses to teams outside the top 100. Charlotte will have every chance to play its way into or out of the field in the coming weeks, as Bobby Lutz&#8217;s team will host Richmond and Xavier and travel to Rhode Island. That March 3 contest in Kingston could be determinative for both teams.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Florida:</strong> The biggest issue is finding deserving teams to replace any of the above five teams. There&#8217;s an unprecedented six-point gap between the team that ranks 34th in my at-large model (Saint Mary&#8217;s) and 35th. The Gators are that 35th team after a home win over Auburn on Thursday. Florida is now 7-4 in conference with four difficult games to come in its last five. When I noted earlier that mid-majors near the bubble are at a disadvantage, I was referring to a schedule like Florida&#8217;s. With trips to Mississippi and Kentucky as well as home dates against Tennessee and Vanderbilt, Billy Donovan&#8217;s team will have plenty of chances to play its way in. At the same time, a 2-3 record would probably leave UF entering the SEC Tournament with plenty of work to do.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>San Diego State:</strong> I&#8217;m not sure if many people have the Aztecs dancing right now, but they are just below Florida in my ranking and are on a winning streak. SDSU has a very good chance to finish 3-1 and enter the Mountain West Tournament at 20-8, 11-5. The problem is that Steve Fisher&#8217;s team could do that with just three wins against top-100 opponents. That means anything less than a victory over BYU, New Mexico or UNLV en route to the Mountain West Tournament final will not be enough to keep SDSU from experiencing the same sort of jilting that happened last March.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Connecticut:</strong> Days after it appeared that the Huskies had lost the chance to play their way into the field with a 12-point home defeat to Cincinnati, UConn came out and completely outplayed Villanova on the Wildcats&#8217; home floor. That unlikely win brings UConn to the brink of the field. The Huskies probably need a 4-1 finish in conference to secure a bid with a 3-2 record meaning that they&#8217;ll head to the Garden in need of some heavy lifting. UConn finishes the conference season with trips to Rutgers, Notre Dame and South Florida as well as home dates with West Virginia and Louisville. It will require increased consistency for the Huskies to take four &#8212; or even three &#8212; of those games.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Marquette:</strong> The Golden Eagles are the only other team on the outside looking in for whom I see a good case for inclusion. My model has long been far more bearish on MU&#8217;s at-large chances than most other projections, and nothing&#8217;s changed with a tough home loss to Pittsburgh on Thursday. The Golden Eagles rank 45th in my at-large list, behind a Southern Cal team not eligible to make the field and a Wichita State team currently in second in the Missouri Valley. I&#8217;ve slipped Buzz Williams&#8217; team past WSU in my last 10 out. Marquette now faces three straight road games &#8212; at Cincinnati, at St. John&#8217;s and at Seton Hall. The Eagles will finish at home against Louisville and Notre Dame. Any of those games is quite winnable or losable, and only a 4-1 finish would put Marquette in good stead. I&#8217;ve long believed that it will take Marquette 21 wins to be assured of a berth with 20 putting the team right on the bubble or perhaps barely on the outside looking in. Marquette is currently 16-9 with quality wins against Xavier, Georgetown and Connecticut and a couple of rough losses at home to N.C. State and at DePaul.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC:</strong> All four of the ACC teams in danger of missing the field won on the midweek, with Virginia Tech&#8217;s home defeat of Wake Forest being the most vital. If I had to guess, I&#8217;d say that all seven of these teams will make it, but it would behoove each of those bottom five to win a few more for safety&#8217;s sake. For instance, Clemson can ill afford to slip up at home against Virginia on Saturday. Maryland hosts Georgia Tech in an important team for both teams but moreso for the Terps. Sunday sees VaTech head to Duke where a Hokies win would all but clinch a bid. Duke, meanwhile, is on the precipice of a top seed should Purdue lose. I still think Syracuse and Kentucky are a bit removed from from the No. 2 seedline for one loss to send either there.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ACC Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Duke (No. 2)<br />
Wake Forest (No. 7)<br />
Georgia Tech (No. 8)<br />
Florida State (No. 9)<br />
Clemson (No. 9, 10th-to-last in)<br />
Virginia Tech (No. 11, seventh-to-last in)<br />
Maryland (No. 11, sixth-to-last in)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12:</strong> Like the ACC, we&#8217;re starting to see the Big 12&#8217;s tourney teams solidify. Oklahoma State escaped with a win in Ames on Wednesday, but the Cowboys face four straight games in which they are likely to be the underdog starting Saturday against Baylor in Stillwater. Travis Ford&#8217;s team will follow up that game with a trip to Texas, Kansas at home and a trip to Texas A&#038;M. So, as comfortable as OSU looks now, a 2-3 finish to the season may send OSU to the Big 12 Tournament needing at least one win. Missouri made the biggest move this week with a win over Texas, which leaves us to wonder how far the Longhorns can fall. On Saturday, they travel to Lubbock to play a Texas Tech team in need of a big win after consecutive losses.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big 12 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Kansas (No. 1)<br />
Kansas State (No. 2)<br />
Baylor (No. 4)<br />
Texas (No. 4)<br />
Missouri (No. 5, moved to No. 6 for conference balancing)<br />
Texas A&#038;M (No. 7)<br />
Oklahoma State (No. 8)<br />
Texas Tech (12th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East:</strong> Villanova&#8217;s home loss drops the Wildcats to a No. 2 seed. It&#8217;s VU&#8217;s second loss in three games, and they now play a very good Pittsburgh team on Sunday. Pitt is looking fairly comfortable as a No. 3 seed, although I&#8217;ve seen many projections where the Panthers are as low as a No. 6. Louisville&#8217;s overtime win against Notre Dame was essential to maintaining the Cardinals&#8217; breathing room.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I mentioned three Big East bubble teams above, but two others &#8212; Seton Hall and South Florida &#8212; are also knocking on the door. The Pirates could really use a win at West Virginia on Saturday. Short of that, getting to 20 wins combining the regular season and the Big East Tournament should do the trick. Nineteen would make Bobby Gonzalez&#8217;s team bubbly. South Florida will host St. John&#8217;s on Saturday followed by a trip to Villanova. Among USF&#8217;s last five conference games, the Bulls will likely be underdogs in only that visit to Philly.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big East Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Syracuse (No. 1)<br />
Villanova (No. 2)<br />
West Virginia (No. 2)<br />
Georgetown (No. 3)<br />
Pittsburgh (No. 3)<br />
Louisville (No. 8)<br />
Cincinnati (No. 12, third-to-last in)<br />
Connecticut (second-to-last out)<br />
South Florida (fourth-to-last out)<br />
Seton Hall (fifth-to-last out)<br />
Marquette (ninth-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten:</strong> Purdue&#8217;s victory at Ohio State &#8212; the Buckeyes&#8217; first home loss of the season &#8212; is enough for Purdue to become a No. 1 seed. The Boilermakers have now won eight straight since that three-game losing streak, which &#8212; as I expected &#8212; has become a distant memory. Wisconsin did not look good in Jon Leuer&#8217;s first game back, losing by 16 to Minnesota on Thursday. That loss will hurt Wisconsin&#8217;s chances at becoming a No. 2 seed, but it didn&#8217;t do all that much to get the Gophers back in the picture. Anything short of a 4-1 finish for Tubby Smith&#8217;s club won&#8217;t be enough for Minnesota to get back in serious consideration. After an ugly home loss to Ohio State on Sunday, Illinois continues its brutal stretch with a trip to Purdue on Saturday. The Illini need to finish 3-2 in conference to assure themselves of a bid. A 2-3 finish means there will be work to do at the Big Ten Tournament for Bruce Weber, Demetri McCamey and the rest of the Illini. Northwestern&#8217;s loss at home to Penn State on Wednesday seals its NIT fate.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Big Ten Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Purdue (No. 1)<br />
Wisconsin (No. 4)<br />
Michigan State (No. 5)<br />
Ohio State (No. 6)<br />
Illinois (No. 11, fifth-to-last in)<br />
Minnesota (15th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10:</strong> The Pac-10 continues to ruin its chances of getting multiple bids. On Thursday, Cal lost by 16 at Oregon State, and Washington lost by three at home to USC. The Trojans would actually be in the last 10 out if they were eligible, but instead, all their victory in Seattle did was ruin UW&#8217;s chances. Cal still has a good shot at an at-large bid, but the Bears will need to finish 3-1 at worst and a win or two in the Pac-10 Tournament to be sure of a bid. Arizona State has three straight road games ahead, starting with a trip to Tucson on Sunday and followed by visits to Stanford and Cal. A 4-1 finish will put ASU within striking distance entering the conference tourney.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Pac-10 Bid Breakdown:</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>California (No. 10)<br />
Washington (13th-to-last out)<br />
Arizona State (14th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC:</strong> Mississippi State couldn&#8217;t get the win it needed against Kentucky on Tuesday and now must finish hard to have a shot at a bid. Mississippi really needed to knock off Vanderbilt at home on Thursday night, but that didn&#8217;t happen either. The Rebels will host Florida on Saturday in what is a must win for Andy Kennedy&#8217;s team. South Carolina barely has a pulse after three losses in four. The Gamecocks will need to finish 3-2 at worse &#8212; against a very difficult schedule, starting with Tennessee at home on Saturday &#8212; to have a shot entering the SEC Tourney. At the top of the league, Kentucky continues to win &#8212; six straight since the loss at South Carolina &#8212; and now have a working margin for a No. 1 seed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>SEC Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Kentucky (No. 1)<br />
Vanderbilt (No. 3)<br />
Tennessee (No. 5)<br />
Florida (last out)<br />
Mississippi (11th-to-last out)<br />
Mississippi State (19th-to-last out)<br />
South Carolina (20th-to-last out)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors:</strong> Memphis has snuck into the last 10 out with a third straight win. The Tigers will have two more shots at big wins as they finish the season with a trip to UAB and a home date with Tulsa. The Blazers have lost three of five but got back on track with a win at Southern Miss on Wednesday and remain in the field. They too have an important finish to the season, hosting Memphis and visiting UTEP. Both Memphis and UAB have three games before those finishes.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I should note that this weekend is Bracket Buster weekend. In one of the most intriguing matchups, Old Dominion visits Northern Iowa. Both teams are trying to secure their at-large credentials should either slip in their respective conference tournaments. Siena is visiting Butler, and the Saints could really use a marquee win for their at-large profile. Wichita State is unlikely to make the field but a win at Utah State could put the Shockers in a spot to contend for a bid. USU is looking good right now, but a win over WSU might be important should the Aggies fall in the WAC Tournament.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Mid-Majors Bid Breakdown:</strong> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>New Mexico (No. 3)<br />
Temple (No. 4)<br />
Brigham Young (No. 5)<br />
Xavier (No. 6, moved to No. 5 for conference balancing)<br />
Gonzaga (No. 6)<br />
Butler (No. 6)<br />
Richmond (No. 7)<br />
Northern Iowa (No. 7)<br />
Utah State (No. 8)<br />
UNLV (No. 9)<br />
Dayton (No. 9)<br />
Old Dominion (No. 10)<br />
UAB (No. 10, ninth-to-last in)<br />
Rhode Island (No. 10, eighth-to-last in)<br />
Siena (No. 11)<br />
William &#038; Mary (No. 12, fourth-to-last in)<br />
Saint Mary&#8217;s (No. 12, second-to-last in)<br />
UTEP (No. 12)<br />
Charlotte (No. 13, last in)<br />
San Diego State (third-to-last out)<br />
Northeastern (sixth-to-last out)<br />
Virginia Commonwealth (seventh-to-last out)<br />
Memphis (eighth-to-last out)<br />
Wichita State (10th-to-last out)<br />
Saint Louis (16th-to-last out)<br />
Tulsa (17th-to-last out)<br />
Marshall (18th-to-last out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20100219/bracket-junkie-plenty-of-posturing-no-changes-in-at-large-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephenson scuffles, Cincinnati prevails in opener</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20091117/stephenson-scuffles-cincinnati-prevails-in-opener/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20091117/stephenson-scuffles-cincinnati-prevails-in-opener/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deonta Vaughn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DePaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Stephenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mick Cronin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prairie View A&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seton Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Toyloy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syracuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNLV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yancy Gates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We waited a long time for Lance Stephenson&#8217;s debut, and we&#8217;ll need to wait a bit longer to witness Stephenson&#8217;s first good performance. The prep standout shot just 2-for-10, grabbed four rebounds and didn&#8217;t contribute maybe tangible peripherals (steals, assists, blocks) in 22 minutes of Cincinnati&#8217;s 69-62 win over Prairie View A&#038;M on Monday night.
&#160;
Stephenson&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We waited a long time for Lance Stephenson&#8217;s debut, and we&#8217;ll need to wait a bit longer to witness Stephenson&#8217;s first good performance. The prep standout shot just 2-for-10, grabbed four rebounds and didn&#8217;t contribute maybe tangible peripherals (steals, assists, blocks) in 22 minutes of Cincinnati&#8217;s 69-62 win over Prairie View A&#038;M on Monday night.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Stephenson&#8217;s poor shooting helped contribute to a first-half deficit that stood at 38-30. Cincinnati had just a 37.1 percent eFG in the first half thanks primarily to 15 misses on 3-point shots in the opening 20 minutes. Mick Cronin&#8217;s team clamped down on defense in the second half, holding Prairie View to just 24 points thanks to Cincy&#8217;s superior size and talent. Yancy Gates and Steve Toyloy combined for 19 rebounds, including eight of teammates&#8217; misses. Cincinnati has to be happy to have the victory, but it wasn&#8217;t a fortuitous start for Stephenson or for his coach, both of whom enter crucial seasons in their careers.<span id="more-1473"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table width="300">
<thead>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Poss</strong></td>
<td><strong>PPP</strong></td>
<td><strong>eFG</strong></td>
<td><strong>Turn</strong></td>
<td><strong>Reb</strong></td>
<td><strong>FTR</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >Prairie View A&#038;M</td>
<td >72</td>
<td >0.86</td>
<td >0.468</td>
<td >0.194</td>
<td >0.225</td>
<td >0.065</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >Cincinnati</td>
<td >72</td>
<td >0.95</td>
<td >0.459</td>
<td >0.235</td>
<td >0.410</td>
<td >0.213</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>This quote from junior Larry Davis has to make Bearcats fans shudder (courtesy the <i>Cincinnati Enquirer</i>): &#8220;We didn’t get prepared for the game. We didn’t get prepared for the game. We came out sluggish. We weren’t ready. We were kind of taking the game for granted.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Whether that&#8217;s the coach&#8217;s fault or the players&#8217; faults, lackluster efforts have become all too common at Cincinnati. You may not remember, but there was a time last season when Cincinnati had a very good shot to make the NCAA Tournament. The Bearcats were 18-10, 8-7 in conference, with wins over UNLV, UAB, Mississippi State, Georgetown (twice), Notre Dame and West Virginia. Cincinnati&#8217;s next four games, including the first game of the Big East Tournament, would be against three teams that would not play in the postseason, plus a trip to Syracuse. Those four games would determine the Bearcats&#8217; fate.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>UC lost all four, including a 24-point loss at Syracuse, an 11-point defeat to lowly USF and a 10-point loss to DePaul in the Big East Tournament. The Blue Demons, you may recall, entered that matchup with an 0-18 record in conference. After that embarrassing loss, UC wasn&#8217;t even invited to play in the NIT.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Entering the homestretch, Cincy&#8217;s offense had shown its first improvements under Cronin, dominating the offensive glass thanks to Gates and Mike Williams. But, in the season-ending losses to Seton Hall and DePaul, the shooting just couldn&#8217;t maintain a passable proficiency, and Cincy reverted to playing brickball.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table width="300">
<thead>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Rec</strong></td>
<td><strong>eFG</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >First 15</td>
<td >8-7</td>
<td >0.566</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >Last Four</td>
<td >0-4</td>
<td >0.432</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Enter Stephenson. With his strength for a guard, Stephenson was supposed to bring Cincinnati added firepower to complement Deonta Vaughn at guard and Gates down low. Stephenson&#8217;s ability to get to the rim and draw contact would help improve the Bearcats&#8217;s woeful free-throw rate (among Big East teams, only Notre Dame got to the line less often last season) and limit their dependence on the 3-pointer, which they had taken too many of last year for a team lacking many good shooters.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One game is not a decisive sample, but it&#8217;s pretty clear that Stephenson&#8217;s impact will not be immediate. He may eventually be the player we&#8217;ve been waiting for, giving Cincinnati an explosive presence on the wing that UC has lacked since James White&#8217;s departure. But, until then, expect many more nights with low-shooting percentages, mediocre offenses and far too much dependence on Deonta Vaughn. I guess some things don&#8217;t change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20091117/stephenson-scuffles-cincinnati-prevails-in-opener/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC WIR: Northeast opposition causes problems in Southeast</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20091115/sec-wir-northeast-opposition-causes-problems-in-southeast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20091115/sec-wir-northeast-opposition-causes-problems-in-southeast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews/Previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcorn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas-Little Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeAundre Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Bledsoe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarvis Varnado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LaSalle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morehead State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niagara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Stansbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rotnei Clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Mary's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanderbilt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In sum: It wasn&#8217;t a pretty weekend for the SEC West against small Northeast programs. After Auburn nearly fell to Niagara on Friday night, Mississippi State did lose to Rider. A day later, Cornell knocked off Alabama in Anthony Grant&#8217;s debut. As a whole, the league went 8-2, and, in the most highly anticipated game, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In sum:</b> It wasn&#8217;t a pretty weekend for the SEC West against small Northeast programs. After Auburn nearly fell to Niagara on Friday night, Mississippi State did lose to Rider. A day later, Cornell knocked off Alabama in Anthony Grant&#8217;s debut. As a whole, the league went 8-2, and, in the most highly anticipated game, Kentucky defeated Morehead State behind terrific play from freshman Eric Bledsoe and junior Patrick Patterson.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Team of the week:</b> Mississippi. There is great popular support behind Andy Kennedy getting the Rebels to break through and make the NCAAs in this his fourth season, and their opening performance won&#8217;t weaken that support. Chris Warren was back and healthy. He didn&#8217;t shoot well (1-for-7 from deep), but he did have seven steals in a 92-64 win over a decent Arkansas-Little Rock team. Mississippi forced 22 turnovers and, as a result, attempted 22 more field goals than the Trojans. Senior DeAundre Cranston scored 21 points in just 21 minutes.<span id="more-1413"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Disappointing Performance:</strong> Mississippi State. Rick Stansbury picked a tough opener for his team, but with so much talent coming back, he&#8217;d probably didn&#8217;t think it would be a problem. He was wrong, of course. Rider made 10-of-16 3-pointers, led by Ryan Thompson&#8217;s 4-for-6 performance, and everyone not named &#8220;Jarvis Varnado&#8221; combined to make just 8-of-27 2-pointers for the Bulldogs. It was a shame to waste Varnado&#8217;s 22-point, 14-rebound, seven-block, 8-for-8-from-the-field performance, but, alas, wasted it was. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Upcoming:</b> On Monday, Auburn travels to Missouri State out of the Missouri Valley. The next day, Arkansas will try to push its luck against Louisville in St. Louis. Despite several suspensions, Arkansas defeated Alcorn State, 130-68, on Friday led by a magnificent 50-point performance from Rotnei Clark. It&#8217;s important to note that Alcorn State stinks &#8212; the Braves lost to Ohio State by 40 earlier in the week &#8212; but Clarke&#8217;s performance is notable nonetheless.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On Thursday, Mississippi and South Carolina open up play in tournaments. The Rebels get Indiana in Puerto Rico, and the Gamecocks play LaSalle in Charleston, S.C. On Friday, Alabama tries to rebound at home against Providence. Meanwhile, Vanderbilt visits St. Mary&#8217;s, and Auburn heads to Daytona Beach to play UCF. Tennessee also opens up play in the Paradise Jam against East Carolina. On Saturday, Georgia visits UAB, while Kentucky hosts Rider. Finally, Auburn plays N.C. State, again in Daytona, on Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20091115/sec-wir-northeast-opposition-causes-problems-in-southeast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not all seven-bid leagues are created equal</title>
		<link>http://www.baselinestats.com/20090317/not-all-seven-bid-leagues-are-created-equal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baselinestats.com/20090317/not-all-seven-bid-leagues-are-created-equal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Mason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pac-10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Cal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wichita State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baselinestats.com/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;



Conference
WinExp




Big East
16.38


ACC
10.88


Big 12
8.18


Big Ten
7.18


Pac-10
5.99


A-10
2.47


C-USA
2.41


MWC
1.83


SEC
1.50


WCC
1.49


Horizon
0.83


MAAC
0.58



&#160;
(Only leagues with a combined win expectancy of at least 0.50 were included on chart above.)
&#160;
What you see above is a chart of win expectancies for each conference this season based on historical performance of each seed in the NCAA Tournament. In my previous piece, I went back over the last three [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td><strong>Conference</strong></td>
<td><strong>WinExp</strong></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >Big East</td>
<td >16.38</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >ACC</td>
<td >10.88</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >Big 12</td>
<td >8.18</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >Big Ten</td>
<td >7.18</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >Pac-10</td>
<td >5.99</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >A-10</td>
<td >2.47</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >C-USA</td>
<td >2.41</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >MWC</td>
<td >1.83</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >SEC</td>
<td >1.50</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >WCC</td>
<td >1.49</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowOdd">
<td >Horizon</td>
<td >0.83</td>
</tr>
<tr class="rowEven">
<td >MAAC</td>
<td >0.58</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>(Only leagues with a combined win expectancy of at least 0.50 were included on chart above.)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What you see above is a chart of win expectancies for each conference this season based on historical performance of each seed in the NCAA Tournament. In my <a href="/20090317/the-ncaa-tourney-and-conference-bragging-rights/">previous piece</a>, I went back over the last three seasons to see how each conference has achieved in comparison to its seeds, and in once of each of those seasons did a conference have a win expectancy of at least 10. This year, two leagues pass the 10-win threshold, with the Big East having what has to be a record at 16.38 wins.<span id="more-872"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>To put in perspective just how difficult it will be for the Big East to meet its 16.38 win expectancy, the league could send two teams to the Final Four and three others to the Sweet 16 and still fall more than two wins shy of this mark. With great seeds come great responsibility, and no league in history &#8212; I&#8217;m willing to bet &#8212; has had as many great seeds as the Big East has in the 2009 NCAA Tournament.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>While the Big East has seeds that would anticipate more than 16 wins and the ACC has seeds that would project double-digit victories, the other seven-bid league &#8212; the Big Ten &#8212; was not as fortunate in its seeding. With just one team seeded on one of the top four lines &#8212; Michigan State, No. 2 in the Midwest &#8212; the Big Ten has less than half the win expectancy of the Big East and less than even the Big 12, which got six bids.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On the other end of the major-conference spectrum is the SEC. With a win expectancy of just 1.50 games thanks to a No. 8, 9 and 13 seed, the SEC has shattered a record low for major conferences over the last four tournaments. The previous low was 5.12 by the Pac-10 in 2006, when that league sent four teams to the Tournament with a No. 2, 5, 7 and 8 seed. The Atlantic 10, Conference USA and Mountain West conferences all have win expectancies surpassing the SEC&#8217;s total this year. The closest any non-major conference had come to topping the win expectancy of a major conference was in 2006 when the Conference USA got a No. 1 (Memphis) and No. 9 (UAB) for a 4.00 win expectancy, 1.12 behind the Pac-10&#8217;s that year</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Beyond win expectancy, three in the last three years a mid-major conference has had more NCAA Tournament wins than a major conference. It happened in 2006 when both the Colonial and the Missouri Valley&#8217;s total of four wins topped the six-bid Big Ten&#8217;s three. Of course, George Mason got four wins by itself that year. Wichita State and Bradley each had two for the Valley. Last year, the Conference USA topped the SEC thanks to Memphis&#8217; five wins and appearance in the national title game. The SEC got four wins last year with Tennessee grabbing two and Mississippi State and Arkansas one each. Barring unexpected performances from the SEC&#8217;s trio, it should happen again this season.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If the Big East is the most likely league to fail to meet expectations &#8212; albeit historically high ones &#8212; the Pac-10 may be the conference most likely to exceed its expectations. With two very strong No. 6 seeds &#8212; Arizona State and UCLA &#8212; as well as a No. 4 seed in the bracket of the weakest No. 1 &#8212; Washington in Connecticut&#8217;s bracket &#8212; and a No. 10 seed matched up with the weakest No. 7 &#8212; Southern Cal vs. Boston College &#8212; the Pac-10 appears to be set up for success. Add to that the Pac-10&#8217;s recent history of exceeding seed expectations, and it may be smart to put your pool-winning hopes in the hands of some West Coasters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baselinestats.com/20090317/not-all-seven-bid-leagues-are-created-equal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
